[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tuning by current mea
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Tuning by current mea
-
From: mark.graalman-at-mediccom.norden1-dot-com (Mark Graalman)
-
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 1995 22:09:00 -0500
-
>Received: from dialup.oar-dot-net by ns-1.csn-dot-net with SMTP id AA15514 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>); Tue, 4 Apr 1995 22:59:02 -0600
-
Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 00:56:49 -0400
-
Resent-From: tesla.list-at-mediccom.norden1-dot-com
-
Resent-Message-Id: <199504050456.AAA21147-at-norden1-dot-com>
-=> Quoting Tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com to Tesla List <=-
Te> e> Message-ID: <9504042230.AA29183-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>
Te> Newsgroups: tesla.list
Te> From Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com Tue Apr 4 16:21 MDT 1995
>Received: from mail06.mail.aol-dot-com by ns-1.csn-dot-net with SMTP id AA19659
Te> (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>); Tue, 4 Apr 1995
Te> 15:59:24 -0600
Te> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 17:59:05 -0400
Te> From: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
Te> To: mark.graalman-at-mediccom.norden1-dot-com
Te> Cc: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
Te> Subject: Tuning by current measurement
Te> cc: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
Te> Mark,
Te> Thanks for the recent posting on measuring secondary current. My
Te> interest in this is to get a better idea of where my sharpest tuning
Te> point is. My system should be high Q. I have it spaced up off the
Te> floor on plastic, I used plastic mounts for my primary (3/8" copper
Te> tubing), moved my RF filters back away from the primary, shortened my
Te> ground paths, etc. - everything that should result in a high Q but I am
Te> having a difficult time finding a nice sharp tuning point by trying to
Te> guage the longest discharge. Also, I don't have an oscilloscope
Te> available.
Te> I would appreciate more commentary on this subject.
Te> Thanks, Ed Sonderman
MG> Ed, I don't know how many turns you have on your primary, or what your
level of pri/sec coupling is, but if you have heavy coupling and alot
of turns in the primary the resulting power transfer to the secondary
can be so high that small errors in the primary frequency will go
un-noticed. Others may argue this, but to be quite honest as far as
tuning the primary coil is concerned, I do the following and it has
always been accurate enough that further tuning other than spark gap
and slight coupling adjustments offer little benefit. I attach a 100K
ohm carbon resistor to the side of the toroid and then to end of the
resistor I attach a #30 wire of a length equal to the appoximate length
of the discharge, and run it out horizontally from the toroid and attach
it to a insulated support. In other words, the wire/ resistor act as the
discharge arc. Then I measure the frequency of the secondary coil with a
scope and generator. I then remove the secondary coil from the vicinity
of the primary and tune the primary circuit frequency to match that of
the secondary. It has never been off by more than about 1/4 turn on the
primary tap placement. By the way, I usually use a pri/sec coupling of
about .15 as a starting point.
Mark Graalman TCBA# 1399
mark.graalman-at-mediccom.norden1-dot-com
... Alias, Mark the spark
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12