[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Primary Q's and Spark Gaps
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Primary Q's and Spark Gaps
-
From: EDHARRIS-at-MPS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
-
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 14:24:06 -0500 (EST)
-
>Received: from phyas1.mps.ohio-state.edu (phyas1.mps.ohio-state.edu [128.146.37.10]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA13372 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc.COM>; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 11:52:07 -0700
Ed Philips wrote:
the response and inverting the above expression to get the
equivalent value of k. Note that, as long as k*Q is much above 3,
the timing depens on k only, and not on Q. By the way, running the
same SPICE simulation made it obvious that one would like much
higher values of k than you might expect from critical coupling,
which gives the maximum gain when the primary is fed from a current
source such as a vacuum tube. The simulation I ran charged the
capacitor to a fixed voltage and then discharged it into the primaryh
winding.
********************************************************************
Hi Ed,
I also ran some simulations and found that going beyond
critical coupling gives much better efficiency. Although there are now
two frequencies, efficiency is improved for k>kc. One of course would not
want to go to k=1 since all the resonant voltage gain would be lost. You
may be interested some papers/book which cover the Q,k parameter space for
pulse discharge circuits:
High Voltage Laboratory Technique - JD Craggs and JM Meek
Design Charts for Tesla Transformer-type relativistic electron beam
generators - H Matsuzawa and S Suganomata
Review of Sicentific Instruments Vol53 No5 May 1982 p694
A Tesla transformer high-voltage generator
CR Hoffmann
Rev Sci Instr Vol46 No1 Jan 1975 p1
Transformer type accelerators for intense electron beams
EA Abramyan
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, NS-18 p447 (1971)
-Ed Harris