Re: Arc length vs pwr

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Arc length vs pwr
• From: Malcolm Watts <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 09:12:47 +1200

Hi Greg,

> Malcolm wrote:
> > 
> >      On tuning: there is one subtlety I have used where Lp and Cp are
> > more-or-less fixed: raising and lowering the top terminal can
> > dramatically alter secondary fr.
> 
> 
> If Cp is large enough so that the sec ckt can be treated as lumped 
> elements, then shouldn't we worry about the toroid acting as a 
> shorted turn, shunting the secondary inductor?
> 
> -GL

That might well become a consideration. Perhaps someone who uses 
_huge_ toploads (Richard Hull?) might check this one out for us ?
I've never used toploads exceeding Cdistr. so I couldn't say right 
now but I should be in a position to find out shortly. My new 
resonator is going to be wound today 

Malcolm

• Prev: Re: Spice simulation pictures
• Next: Re: Arc length vs pwr
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread