[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 10X Arcs
Tesla List wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: 10X Arcs
> > >Subject: 10X Arcs
>
> >From hullr-at-whitlock-dot-comWed Sep 11 22:24:24 1996
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 08:46:17 -0700
> From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: 10X Arcs
>
> Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > >From jim.fosse-at-bdt-dot-comTue Sep 10 22:11:17 1996
> > Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 04:49:13 GMT
> > From: Jim Fosse <jim.fosse-at-bdt-dot-com>
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: 10X Arcs
> >
> > >Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 17:22:21 -0700
> > >From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
> > >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > >Subject: 10X Arcs
> > >
> > >All,
> > >
> > >I don't know if I reported this yet. Last Thursday, We, at the TCBOR,
> > >just went over the 10X mark in spark output!! That is right. We have
> > >sparks on film (both video and still photos showing the point-to-point
> > >arcs from our 1 foot long winding resonator on maggey #11-E zapping my
> > >nikon 35 MM right on the lens 121" from the terminal discharge point.
> > >The spark is not white hot, nor is it thin and "played out". (somewhere
> > >about in the middle of these extremes.)
> > >
> >
> > Awesome, (both in the literal and vernacular meanings)
> >
> > Please let us know if the film in the nikon shows any signs of
> > fogging or physical tracks. I'm curious to know if secondary arcing
> > occurred inside the camera body.
> >
> > jim
>
> Jim,
>
> Already have the film back! The film was not fogged or altered in any
> way. The arc racing to the eye is quite a thing to behold. A most
> interesting photo to say the least!
>
> Richard Hull, TCBOR
Congratulations on setting another record!! Any chance you could get a
scanned image up where we could all see it? How about on your TCBOR
site?
-- Bert --