Re: self-C comments

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: self-C comments
• From: Skip Greiner <sgreiner-at-mail.wwnet-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 15:35:35 -0700

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >From MSR7-at-PO.CWRU.EDUFri Aug 30 21:24:23 1996
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 07:23:29 -0400
> From: MSR7-at-PO.CWRU.EDU
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: self-C comments
> 
> Hello All,
> <snip prior comments>
>         Regarding inverting a conical coil, coupling becomes very poor since
> the bulk of the secondary inductance is distant from the primary coil.
> Perhaps an hourglass shape?
> Regards,
> Mark S. Rzeszotarski, Ph.D.


Mark

Have you actually wound one or are you basing this on theoretical
considerations. I am planning to build an inverted conical TC and I do
not understand why I cannot supply an inverted cone primary to drive it.
There may be some interesting shading phenomena with an inverted
secondary.

Skip

• Prev: Re: earth resonance
• Next: Re: Arc length vs pwr
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread