[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: Re: Variac vs. Fan speed control
Subject: RE: Re: Variac vs. Fan speed control
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 20:31:37 GMT
From: robert.michaels-at-online.sme-dot-org (Robert Michaels)
Organization: Society of Manufacturing Engineers
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
[ ... ]
-> quite simple. Original sine-wave (ascii art:) :
-> /-\
-> / \
-> -\ /-/ \-\ /- etc.
-> \ / \ /
-> \_/ \_/
-> now, start the dimmer..
-> /|
-> / |
-> -\ |----/ |----\ |--- etc..
-> \ | \ |
-> \| \|
-> now, if you turn the dimmer to a lower position :
[ ... ]
Excellent explaination and ASCII art! You reall must have put
some work into that.
For the sake of completeness - and truth in posting - a foot
note needs to be added to this:
Older triac controllers worked exactly as you described. Cheaper
ones today probably still do in many places: The phase angle
of the ac is varied in proportion to the setting of the control
knob.
In the US however, it is no longer permissible to sell such
devices. The sharp cut-off of the ac wave generates rf which
causes considerable interference with communications.
So - modern solid-state controllers use zero-crossing control.
The switching performed by the controller is done only at the
split instant when the sine wave crosses the X-axis. Since the
switching is done at or near zero volts, rf radiation is
minimal.
When viewed with a 'scope, the waveform of such controllers
appears to be whole sine wave cycles which occur sporadically.
The intervals between such whole sine wave cycles become shorter
and shorter as the control knob setting is increased. At full
power the intervals are essentially zero and the output is a
continuous sine wave.
... But they =still= shouldn't be used anywhere near Tesla
coils as I believe the original poster has established to
to his (and most anyone else's) complete satisfaction.
Sine-ing off in - Detroit, USA
Robert Michaels