Re: X-mas Experiments

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: X-mas Experiments
From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 14:14:45 -0800
Subscriber: hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com Mon Jan 6 22:10:36 1997

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Subscriber: knardell-at-mailhost.accesscom-dot-net Sat Jan  4 21:38:48 1997
> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 03:47:58 -0600
> From: Kevin <knardell-at-mailhost.accesscom-dot-net>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: X-mas Experiments
> 
> Huge Snip
> >> 5.  The continual reading of negative voltage on the electrometer while
> >> recording positive charge remains a mystery.
> 
> Is this not the law of opposites ? It was my amateur understanding that if
> you have a positive source emitting, surrounding items will poses a negative
> charge, correct me if wrong, I may be butting in where I surely don't
> belong. I was just curious on that point. I used to experiment with the ion
> motor with flybacks and found that the metal items around the motor when in
> operation were charged and would give you a static zap.
>    ********************************************
>    * T   E   S   L   A      C   O   I   L   S *
>    ********************************************
> Kevin Nardelle  

Kevin,

What you have mentioned is possible, but only through the artifice of a 
process called "induction".  I am studying this possible explaination 
now.  However, the simple law of opposites as you idealize is not the  
normal action.  A positive charge floating about generally charges all 
bodies poisitve and vice versa.  Induction usually requires an 
intermediate step or causal action.

If this is what is happening then this intermediate step must be 
pinpointed.

Richard Hull, TCBOR