Re: Charge Carriers

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Charge Carriers
From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 11:58:46 -0800
Subscriber: hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com Thu Jan 2 22:40:29 1997

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Subscriber: rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com Fri Dec 20 23:00:14 1996
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:53:40 -0800
> From: Richard Wayne Wall <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Charge Carriers
> 
> 12/20/96
> 
> Fred Bach, all
> 
> RH opines that TCs deposit eletrostatic charge on a receiver by an
> "ionic acoustic wave".  Do you have any idea what the ion(s) are and
> their associated energies, potentials and mean free paths?
> 
> RWW

Richard,

As you saw during your visit with me the other day, the requirement for a 
"flee time" resulting from my experiments tend to lend some support for 
the ion method of transfer.  What the ions (I prefer to call them charge 
agents) are and their method of production, lifetimes, mean free path 
etc., are up for discussion.

  Traditionally ions, electrons, etc.  shouldn't be able to make the long 
distance trip, either in time or mean free path.  I agree that something 
of a non-standard, non-ready to serve explaination is needed here.  
Rydberg atoms, charge clusters????

Richard Hull, TCBOR