[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Tesla Twin





---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 09:31:10 -0400
From: Thomas McGahee <tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Tesla Twin 



----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Tesla Twin 
> Date: Wednesday, October 01, 1997 11:19 PM
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 18:18:17 -0400
> From: "Edward J. Wingate" <ewing7-at-frontiernet-dot-net>
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Re: Tesla Twin
> 
> Tesla List wrote:
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:04:46 -0700
> > From: Skip Greiner <sgreiner-at-wwnet-dot-com>
> > To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> > Subject: Re: Tesla Twin
> > 
> 
> > I must have been asleep when I wrote this one. I plan to direct
connect
> > the driven secondary base direct to the undriven secondary base.
I do
> > not plan to use a ground connection on either base. I believe
that the
> > undriven secondary will act as a perfect counterpoise to the
driven
> > secondary.
> > 
> > Again ...thanks for any observations
> > 
> > Awake in Detroit
> > 
> > Skip
> 
> Skip,
> 
> My twin doesn't work well at all without the common earth ground at
the
> base of the secondaries. It will be interesting to see if your new
> system works without it! Good luck.
> 
> Safe coiling,
> 
> Ed Wingate

Ed,
Have you ever contemplated disconnecting BOTH grounds and
direct-wiring the bases of the scondaries together? This is the
arrangement that Malcolm was describing, and I can vouch for the fact
that at least in a table-top system it works better than the grounded
system... although I am somewhat wary of approaching the top of
either secondary with anything that IS grounded.

Fr. Tom McGahee