Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 22:59:21 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 04:27:12 +0000
From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)   

At 08:21 PM 10/13/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 11:53:36 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Richard Wayne Wall <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com>
>To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)  
>

>I specified in my post that the driver is not continuous wave, but fast 
>rising pulses with information content (read harmonics) and relatively 
>long periods of quiessence between pulses.  The vacuum tubes or IGBTs  
>are driven electronically and not by feed back from the resonator.
>
>RWW

------------------------------------------------------------------

  Richard -

  Aren't the pulses filtered into continuous sine waves by the inductive
load? Have you checked the wave at the load with a scope?

  John Couture

• Prev: Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC
• Next: Re: Newbie question (Acrylic = Mylar?)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread