Primary Qs

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Primary Qs
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:30:27 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	FutureT-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Monday, September 22, 1997 4:00 AM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: Primary Qs

In a message dated 97-09-22 01:11:06 EDT, you write:

<< snip> I got far better results in both types
> of primary with the lower frequency resonator. The only reason I can 
> attribute that to is the higher primary Q I got with lower frequency 
>running. The primary cap was also identical and single shot 
> measurements showed output voltage to be roughly the same. Both 
> resonators are wound with large enough wire to discount secondary 
> losses from the mix. I was getting solid three feet strikes with a 
> 25nF CP primary cap from the low frequency resonator but only about 
> 2-1/2 feet from the higher frequency one.
 
> Malcolm >>

Malcolm,

I'm sorry to hear that your neons were snatched all too early by the
grim reaper, and I'm waiting to hear of the mechanism of their death. 
Your low frequency observation is intriquing.  Perhaps my sync-TC is 
benefiting from its ~90kHz operation?

John Freau

• Prev: Peak cap voltage, was 12kV, 30ma TC specs, 42" spark
• Next: Garage door
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread