[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Modeling a magnifier
----------
From: John H. Couture [SMTP:couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 1998 6:45 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
Richard, All -
I agree that the doing is important. Have you made comparison tests
between the classical coil and magnifier? If so, what were the results?
John Couture
------------------------------------------------------------------
At 12:09 AM 2/23/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>----------
>From: richard hull [SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
>Sent: Sunday, February 22, 1998 6:52 PM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
>
>At 04:26 PM 2/21/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>----------
>>From: Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz [SMTP:acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br]
>>Sent: Friday, February 20, 1998 4:41 PM
>>To: Tesla List
>>Subject: Modeling a magnifier
>>
>>Hi:
>>
>>I was studying how to model a Tesla magnifier, and would like to hear
>>comments on my reasoning:
>>
--------------------------------------- Big snip
>Magnifiers are not a casually assembled system. If they were, hundreds of
>coilers would be all overtop of them. As it is, I can number on two hands
>the total number of living beings who I feel have a grip on the construction
>and the DOING of these systems.
>
>I haven't enough molecules in my body, however, to equal the number of
>people who are willing profer advice from afar or on high. If you must
>model, choose one and then build. Don't sit there and build more complex
>models based on book knowledge given by physicists and RF researchers. How
>many of those who wrote the theroy ever built stunningly performing Tesla
>systems? - two or three coilers?
>
>Richard Hull, TCBOR
>
>
>