[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
D & B , continued.
----------
From: Bert Hickman [SMTP:bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 1998 8:50 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: D & B , continued.
Tesla List wrote:
>
> ----------
> From: L.Robertson [SMTP:LWRobertson-at-email.msn-dot-com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 1998 1:34 AM
> To: Tesla Builders
> Subject: D & B , continued.
>
> Hi ...
>
> I did a few more tests using the previous setup, with
> the 1.8 uF / 60 kV cap between the bottom of the
> secondary and ground. I have a normal AC tesla
> primary, and a well filtered DC supply to energize
> the big cap.
>
> Using only 4 inches of spark ( mindful of GL's and
> Mr. Wysock's experiences ) I measured 0.5 ma of
> DC being induced in the DC cap, with the DC supply
> disconnected. Positive was towards the bottom of
> the secondary. This varied with the intensity of the
> spark, as one might expect. It took 14 seconds on
> an average to charge the cap to 1000 volts.
>
> Next with the DC supply hooked up, nothing much
> happened until at around 10 kV, when periodically
> one of the sparks would become much brighter, much
> fatter - around 1/4 inch - and give off a rich sounding pop.
> The end of the spark at the copper ground rod had
> a greenish tinge, and at the aluminum torus was
> whitish, indicating probably some metal erosion.
>
> I'll crank up the power a bit tomorrow, after carefully
> unplugging anything sensitive.
>
> LR
Larry,
Nice experiment! If you were to continue charging the cap from the coil
does the voltage continue to rise significantly above 1 kV? BTW, as you
increase spark energy, you may want to physically remove any sensitive
electronic equipment, since EMP can still "fry" unplugged electronic
equipment from the induced EMF's on testleads, power cords, and even
long circuit board traces.
Safe coilin' to you, Larry!
-- Bert --
-- Bert --