magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:44:34 -0600
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

----------
From:  Antonio C. M. de Queiroz [SMTP:acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br]
Sent:  Sunday, March 22, 1998 1:02 AM
To:  Tesla List
Subject:  Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)

Malcolm Watts wrote:

> I am personally happy with the results I've obtained. As I say, k for
> my driver was somewhere between 0.4 and 0.5 and I obtained overall
> k with unequivocal resolution from the scope of less that 0.1. In fact
> I have the first piccies of the traces back now. I will scope the
> same driver with different primaries and different resonators at some
> stage.

Precise descriptions of the characteristics of the system (Ls, Cs, k),
of how the measurements were made, and the pictures would be of great
value for the understanding of the magnifier operation.
Will you make these pictures avaliable?

Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq

• Prev: Thoughts on making choke cores.
• Next: PRIMARY??
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread