Re: Marco's RSG

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Marco's RSG
From: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz> (by way of Terry Fritz <terryf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:18:14 -0600
Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

Hi Cabbott,
            I've used the same scheme to catch async rotary misses 
when using a NST. No other reason. I like to run with as few gaps in 
series as I can get away with.

Malcolm
<snip>

> <italic>I set my RQ sparkgap wide (5 sections) and connected my RSG in
> parallel</italic> 
> 
> <italic>with it. Instead of the discontinuous rattling I was used to ear
> I got now</italic> 
> 
> <italic>a constant tone. Wow!"</italic> 
> 
> 
> Marco, 
> 
> 
>     Is it true that you set your RQ gap in parallel????  this is new to
> me, as it is opposite from the way i've seen anyone else do it. usually
> gaps are put in series with eachother, to augment quenching.   i would
> think that an RQ gap in parallel with a RSG wouldnt do much.  maybe it
> was a type-o??  Can anyone else fill me in here?