[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why dont you make some BL
to: Cabbott
In all fairness I can't say anything bad about the Corum's or their
research, but as they say, " I'm from Missouri -- show me".
DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Why dont you make some BL
> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 1998 9:46 PM
>
> Original Poster: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
>
> Hi Cabbott,
>
> > Date forwarded: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 19:06:15 -0600
> > Date sent: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:25:49 -0600
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: Why dont you make some BL
> > Forwarded by: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>
> > Original Poster: Cabbott Sanders <cabbott-at-cyberis-dot-net>
> >
> >
> >
> > Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > > Original Poster: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
> > >
> > > to: Cabbott
> > >
> > > In case you haven't guessed why we're not all rushing to do it -- it
> > > doesn't work! Been there, done that at 20 kw with dual coils set up
> > > exactly as per Corum description.
> > >
> > > DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
> >
> > HMMMMMMM.......... that is SO wierd, D.C... If this is the case,
could the
> > Corum research be an elaborate hoax? I'm trying to be open as I can to
the
> > possibility of such. I have never seen ball lightning, but I know it
must
> > exist from everyone else telling me..... WELL if ball lightning
exists,
> > THERES
> > GOT TO BE A WAY TO MAKE IT, RIGHT?? <sigh> looks like i'll just have
to get
> > more power.....
> >
> > -"Playing with forces that quote: "best be left alone"
> > - Cabbott Sanders
>
> I have read their stuff fairly extensively and found a lot of it open
> to question on many grounds without even looking at the BL bits.
> There is more than a hint that even their measurement techniques
> could be wanting in some departments. I have also questioned Ken C.
> personally and received some rather nebulous answers to specific
> points regarding straightforward TC operation. One of the papers in
> the 1990 ITS Notes contains a glaring mathematical error which put
> in doubt one of their most treasured theories.
>
> Malcolm
>