Re: anyone? shortform and inner primary?

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: anyone? shortform and inner primary?
• From: Bob James <nrgdude-at-pond-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:19:47 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

I would like to know more about this also but don't really have anything to
add at this point- I have tried with little success.....JJ

Tesla List wrote:

> Original Poster: arrie <solva-at-xs4all.nl>
>
> Dear all please consider the following:
>
> Want to build my primary inside the secondary. Believe that with a tight
> coupling much less input power is needed and a much higher q is
> achieved! Tuning the primary will be more hassle but lifting will be
> easier on the other hand.
>
> and: who has experience with very large diameter and short forms?
>
> who?
>
> bye arwin, the netherlands

• Prev: Re: [FAQ]
• Next: Re: Paralleling FET's
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread