Re: Coupling coeff. vs Voltage gain (was Re: Who needs aquenching gap ?)

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>

I'd be interested in finding out what the real "journal name" is too,
because some of the early works are in this journal, and I've been having
trouble finding them.

Tesla list wrote:
> 
> Original poster: "Marco Denicolai by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs.fi>
> 
> Antonio,
> 
> Thanks for the paper. Basically nothing new inthere, besides some maybe
> interesting references.
> 
> Maybe some of the german list members could help us and get the (2) papers?
> 
> A. Oberbeck. Wied. Ann. 55, 623 (1895)               what is this "annals"
> complete name?
> P. Drude, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 13, 512 (1904)
> 
> Regards
> 
> "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> on 21.12.2000 06:54:48
> 
> To:   tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> cc:    (bcc: Marco Denicolai/MARTIS)
> Subject:  Re: Coupling coeff. vs Voltage gain (was Re: Who needs a
quenching
>       gap ?)
> 
> Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>
> 
> Tesla list wrote:
> >
> > Original poster: Marco Denicolai <Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs.fi>
> 
> > >The paper is readable. Do you have at hand the reference [5]?
> 
> > Sadly not. If you are able to get it, please, let me have a copy.
> 
> A copy of the paper:
> "Greater voltage gain for Tesla-tansformer accelerators",
> by J. L  Reed, Review of Scientific Instruments, 59 (10), Oct. 1988,
> pp. 2300,
> is at:
> http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/theory
> There is a pcx version (ugly) and a better, and much smaller,
> djv version (get the decoder at www.djvu-dot-com).
> 
> The subject is the idea of getting higher gain for a Tesla
> coil -with given fixed inductances- by detuning it by increasing
> the primary capacitance. Only the fastest mode is considered.
> 
> Note the references to papers from 1895 and 1904 in the Annalen
> der Physik. Do someone have these?
> 
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz