Re: staccato CW RF envelope effects

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>

All,

I forgot to include the actual spark lengths in my origninal post
about this issue.  I've re-written the portion below and added the 
spark length data.

>  Using the rising half of the wave (from 0 to sine peak), I get dim,
>  long straight sparks 13" long(raspy sound).  Using the middle
>  portion, I get bright, long straightish sparks, 14" long.  Using the
>  final portion of the sine, I get dim, short, very branched sparks
>  6" long.  So this pretty much agrees
>  with some things that Bert H and Richie said about the effect of the 
>  RF envelope shape.  It seems the peak power must be there for 
>  some time to make the sparks bright.  Declining waveforms cause 
>  bad branching and short sparks.  One of the best arrangements was
>  when the middle portion was used, but with the rising portion
>  favored somewhat.  
>  
>  John Freau