[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Primary coil idea
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Hollmike-at-aol-dot-com>
Hi Pete,
What you are saying would be workable, but you must keep a couple of
things in mind. First, the coupling between the coils needs to be
loose(around 0.2 for the coupling coefficient). What you are suggesting
could easily lead to overcoupling which will cause two frequencies to be
generated on the secondary(which are equally displaced on either side of the
actual resonant frequency of the coil). The problem with this is that
constructive/destructive intereference will occur and cause spots of high
voltage to appear at locations below the top of the coil. I think the hot
spots will actually travel up and down the secondary at a rate equal to the
difference between the two frequencies assuming it doesn't burn up the
windings on the first pass. This is why most people simply use a flat spiral
primary.
Another problem to consider is that if you use a small clearance between
the primary and secondary, is that you will have to provide adequate
insulation between the coils to prevent flashovers. This can pose quite a
challenge. Again, this is a good reason to stick with a flat spiral primary.
Mike
<< Imagine two series helical primary coils. An inner coil wound on 6" PVC
using #12 THHN insulated wire(about 7 turns per inch). An outer coil wound
on 8" PVC using #12 bare wire with enough spacing between winds to allow
tapping and air insulation.
Or an inner tight wound helical with an outer spiral wound part for
adjustability.
Wouldn't some variation of this work and be a lot more compact than the
usual spiral primary?
Is the magnetic field more compact with a smaller coil (same inductance with
smaller area)?
Is there any advantage or disadvantage to larger or smaller (in area)
primary coils?
Regards,
Pete Komen
I have lots of ideas and things to try, I just need more time...more
money...more space...
>>