[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Twin coils on ebay
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com>
In a message dated 7/17/01 1:50:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:
>
> Original poster: "Brent Turner by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <
> bturner-at-apc-dot-net>
>
> Interestingly enough, if the common toaster were a recently developed
> product, then it's liability issues would be a nightmare! Think about it
> - you have a device which exposes the consumer to 120V AC wall power via
> the heater elements. Stick a metal eating utinsil into it to extract
> your stuck slice of toast, and zap, bam!
>
> Reason it's still around (and relatively cheap) is that it's considered
> a 'common' device, and has been around for a long time.
>
> While Tesla coils are likewise 'old' devices, they aren't 'common', and
> can be considered unique. This was an issue I debated when working on my
> book. I didn't want to actually present 'plans', but rather explain
> existing technology which wasn't unique to me. That way, I can't
> effectively be held responsible (there's the key word, BTW) for stuff
> that already exists. OK, try and sue good ol' Nicky-boy who invented the
> thing.
>
> While I am not a lawyer, (and any comments on this idea are welcome by
> those more knowledgeable) it might be better to sell the thing in a
> non-functional state. That way, the buyer must make the initiative to
> make it actually functional.
>
> Still, it might not be a bad idea to take up a collection or something
> and find a sympathetic lawyer who can draft up a 'boilerplate' standard
> disclaimer/sales agreement/liability waiver that could go to great
> lengths in covering one's hind end.
>
> - brent
Hi All,
While it is true that a hungry lawyer will feed on anything
including its own progeny and offal, most companies get around the
fear-of-litigation paralysis by risk analysis and risk management. Perhaps
the following survey would allow coilers to assess the risk, if we all
responded to it:
1. Have you sold any HV device and gotten sued for a third party accident?
2. Do you know anyone who sold any HV device that got sued for a third party
accident?
3. Do you know anyone who knows anyone who sold any HV device that got sued
for a third party accident?
Assuming a thousand people answering the questions, then:
Every yes answer to question #1 would indicate 1:1000 odds, each yes to #2
would indicate 1:50,000 and each yes to #3 would indicate 1:2,500,000.
I think you'll find that the odds, based on experience, are less than that of
being hit by a meteorite.
For $0.02 plain,
Matt D.