Re: Tesla's World Electrical System (was Field Mill Voltmeter

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>

Dear all,
         I have to agree with those who have been negative on the 
patent aspect of this topic. The fact that a perpetual motion machine 
was patented (some kind of magnetic motor - Johnson I think), and the 
fact that a firm of lawyers could get a patent on presenting a cursor 
on a computer monitor by exclusive-or'ing the pixels involved, years 
after that was a well recognized technique by those versed in the art 
(myself included) proves the worthlessness of invoking arguments 
about patents to support claims of novelty. So let's get to the facts 
on wireless transmission, such as they are.

Regards,
malcolm


On 4 May 01, at 21:16, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>"
> <Mddeming-at-aol-dot-com>
> 
> In a message dated 5/4/01 7:33:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes: 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Original poster: "Richard Wayne Wall by way of Terry Fritz < 
> > twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com> 
> >
> > 5/4/01 
> >
> > Bill Wysock and list, 
> >
> > Bill the problem you point out is that most people want to analyze
> > Teslas longitudinal transmission systems in terms of orthodox
> > transverse EM transmission theory.  This absolutely cannot be done. 
> 
>  The language and 
> physics 
> don't permit it. 
> 
> Quite true, physics does not permit it. 
> 
> This presents a huge barrier in their comprehension of what's 
> >
> > really going on with Teslas longitudinal transmission.  Through no
> > fault of their own, they have been educationally denied the
> > existence of transverse EM wave theory.  However, the "most learned"
> > should be faulted for not keeping an open mind and out of hand
> > dismissing the work and ideas of others.  The history of physics is
> > riddled with the corpses of these die hard nay longitudinal. 
> >
> > For those who demand proof of longitudinal transmission perhaps the
> > following link will interest you.  It is a US patent for a
> > hyper-light-speed antenna utilizing longitudinal propagation in
> > another spatial dimension.  Hint: Aether.  (gasp!)
> 
> 
> 
> Nice try. Many people on the list probably don't realize that a patent
> can be obtained for a device that never worked, or that a patent can
> be issued for a device that has never existed outside of the mind of
> the inventor. The only time the inventor is in trouble is when someone
> else invents a similar device and claims that theirs works and the
> original doesn't. This, of course doesn't prove it's not real, only
> that it doesn't have to be real to be patented. 
> 
> 
> >
> > So, here is a modern example of Teslas longitudinal
> > transmission/reception embodied in real hardware.  The concepts
> > while a little foreign are not that complicated and the antennas
> > should be relatively easy to construct.  So, time to get cracking. 
> > Eh, Malcolm? 
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, there is no proof that working hardware is real. If one
> or two were to be built, the hardware necessary to verify trans-light
> speeds would be costly enough that few could take up the challenge.
> (Building it would, of course not seter the faithful.) 
> 
> >
> > <http://www.delphion-dot-com/details?&pn=US06025810__>http://www.delphio
> > n-dot-com/d etails?&pn=US06025810__ 
> >
> > RWW 
> 
> 
> Matt D.
> 
> 
>