Re: spark gap and cat hair

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "BunnyKiller by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <bigfoo39-at-telocity-dot-com>

Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Beans45601-at-aol-dot-com>
>
>Does cat (and dog) hair affect the performance of a secondary  coil? I hope
>not...
>which works better? a RQ gap or a vacuum gap? 
>
>
>
>
if there is a fair amount of hair to deal with ... I think the vacuum 
gap would be better.