[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Primary radius inside secondary radius/ elevated secondary?

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Primary radius inside secondary radius/ elevated secondary?
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:06:41 -0600
Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:06:36 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <Y0ll4.A.7YD.rWrV9-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>

In a message dated 8/11/02 12:45:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:

Yes,  I've done that often.

John


>
> My planned solution is to raise the secondary ABOVE the primary on insulated
> supports -so the primary radius will in effect be within the radius of the
> secondary. Is this OK?
>
>

Prev by Date: Re: Differential triggered gap
Next by Date: Re: Streamer loading effect
Prev by thread: Primary radius inside secondary radius/ elevated secondary?
Next by thread: Re: Primary radius inside secondary radius/ elevated secondary?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread