RE: The PING Test

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "John H. Couture by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <couturejh-at-mgte-dot-com>


John -

I thought you were referring to a different coil and new measurements.

John Couture

------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:00 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: The PING Test


Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<FutureT-at-aol-dot-com>

John

I posted the specs for that coil about 100 times over the last few
years.  I didn't make any Q measurements.  I just compared
input power and spark lengths for the two configurations;
high inductance vs. low inductance for the primary and secondary.
Higher surge impedance gives lower gap losses because of
the lower currents.  This is because of the non-linear nature
of spark gaps.

John

>
> John -
>
> Can you give us more details on this coil and the test? What size is the
> secondary, turns, etc. Where measurements made of the Q factors before and
> after the turns were changed? Were other measurements made?
>
> Do you know what the relationship is between the the surge impedance and
gap
> losses?
>
> John Couture