[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 40w globe lightbulb = safe plasma ball?
Original poster: "davep by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <davep-at-quik-dot-com>
Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Jamie Mereness by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <mereness-at-mindspring-dot-com>
> I recall learning on this list that low wattage bulbs have high vacuum and
> no backfill. The evacuation is sufficient to generate X-rays.
How low is "low"?
My impression is that this applied to 7W and down, say
xmas size and down. If the bulb has streamers inside, its
not evacuated...
>>Original poster: "davep by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
>><davep-at-quik-dot-com>
>>>I use a 40watt clear glass globe light bulb to aid in
>>>tuning and an interesting display.
>>>when it displays purple, I find this pleasing. however,
>>>the bulb has started to emit a pale green tint (on its interior)
>>>as well.
>>>I'm guessing that lightbulbs typically are not a very low vacuum.
>>Most are NOT vacuum at all, being backfilled with
>>Argon, or whatever, to help keep the filament from
>>evaporating itself onto the inside.
>>>Low enough that xrays or higher energy emissions would be possible.
>>There is little higher than xrays (ok: hard gammas:
>>also hard to make.
>>>I've heard some comments on some tesla pages that coils can
>>>generate such high energy particles. under what conditions should
>>>i expect xrays or higher from a coil ?
>>Almost always need hard vacuum for xray production.
>>
>>Might do some test runs with film, in light tight
>>packet. Hard to know how to calibrate results.
>>
>>(Tesla did some experiments with xray tubes...)
--
best
dwp
...the net of a million lies...
Vernor Vinge
There are Many Web Sites which Say Many Things.
-me