Re: WinTesla Equations Version 5.5

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "D.C. Cox by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <resonance-at-jvlnet-dot-com>



The 8.7 kV/in was a measurement for sec. coil discharges, not in the primary
circuit.
This value was measured with a coil running at 7.5 kva.

Dr. Resonance




----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: WinTesla Equations Version 5.5


> Original poster: "Lau, Gary by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<Gary.Lau-at-hp-dot-com>
>
> I would suggest that WinTesla make no attempt to calculate static gap
> spacings.  This is something that must be determined experimentally, since
> everyone's electrode geometry (and altitude!) will be different.  While a
> ballpark figure would be useful, I fear that nubies seeing a figure
> generated by a widely used computer program would take that as Gospel and
> make no further attempt to set the gap experimentally.
>
> But even as a ballpark, do you really believe that a 6kV NST (8.4kV peak)
> will jump a 1 inch gap?  Certainly not at sea level!
>
> Regards, Gary Lau
> MA, USA
>
>
> >Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <Rscopper-at-aol-dot-com>
> >
> >Looks to me like no one really knows what the correct equation should be.
If
> >we all decide on one I'll put it in WinTesla Version 5.5.  There's quite
a bit
> >of work to do on the rotary spark gap section anyway.  8400V/in was good
> at the
> >time I wrote Version 3.2 over 2.5 years ago.
> >
> >R. Scott Coppersmith
>
>
>