[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vicious Cycle!
Original poster: "robert heidlebaugh by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <rheidlebaugh-at-desertgate-dot-com>
Ken: A general answer is NO. The wire in a 400 Hz unit is much less than a
60 Hz transformer so the reactance of the coil is much to low for 60 Hz use.
The primary reason for 400Hz use on aircraft is to reduce weight and size.
There are some exceptions. Some transformers are made special for 50/1600 Hz
use but these are not common. In general you can go up in frequency not
down. a 50 Hz transformer works up to 1600 Hz, but a 60 Hz transformer will
over heat on 50 Hz.
Robert H
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:54:20 -0600
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Vicious Cycle! (fwd)
> Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:56:45 -0600
>
> Original poster: "Jim Lux by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> <jimlux-at-earthlink-dot-net>
>
> Much smaller core... at 400 Hz, you don't need as much iron in the core. It
> will saturate at a much lower voltage (i.e. 110 * 60/400) volts. 400 Hz is
> widely used on aircraft, for just this reason. (And you thought they did it
> to create that really annoying whine on an airplane...)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com.rmpg-dot-org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:40 PM
> Subject: Vicious Cycle! (fwd)
>
>
>> Original poster: Tesla List Moderator <mod1-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:58:30 -0700
>> From: Ken's Mail <bluewaterdiver-at-earthlink-dot-net>
>> To: 'Tesla list' <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>> Subject: Vicious Cycle!
>>
>> What's the difference between a 400hz Variac and a 60hz Variac? Besides
>> the obvious!! :o)
>>
>> Can a 400hz model be used on 60hz lines?
>>
>> Specifically a Technipower Type M10G3.
>>
>> Thanks in advance..
>>
>> Ken Stevens
>>
>>
>
>
>