[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: differential probes
Original poster: "Daniel Barrett by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <dbarrett1-at-austin.rr-dot-com>
Hi All!
Just a thought here- This spark gap section could really just be part of
the PC layout: Route the potentially high current signals with maybe 10 mil
tracks, separated from each other by an inch, but "T" off a spark gap
between these tracks. That way an arc will occur in a controlled spot on the
board and the feeding traces will be small enough to vaporise. Should
provide an easy to make fuse, but I guess the board would need a lot of
rework between accidents ;)
db
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:54 PM
Subject: RE: differential probes
> Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>
>
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> I have the 'stuff' here to find the "precise 0.177 caliber BB spacing" but
> ran out of time tonight :-(
>
> I am thinking you should not order any boards till we can work some of
> these details out more. Today, I talked to some folks that had some
strong
> arguments for using cap in parallel with the resistors. I fear that
> ordering boards now would mean that they would be "obsoleted" pretty
> quickly... I don't know how much the boards cost, but I would not want
you
> spending and serious money on something we know is going to change...
>
> So, I think there are too many question to go getting boards right now.
We
> need to work more on this front end fusing and capacitance stuff. I think
> I can get this stuff answered in a few days, so we would have a good
chance
> that "that" version would be "the" version.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
>
> At 08:41 PM 7/15/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >My stun gun used two staples for a spark gap. They
> >formed an X shape, and could be adjusted by pushing on
> >it. I would just need a way to calibrate it. If I used
> >"BBs" or 0.25 inch balls, I could solder them in
> >holes, and just look up the breakdown voltage for
> >spheres.
> >
> >I'll cut the boards up wherever it looks like it needs
> >it.
> >
> >
> >--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> > > Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>
> > >
> > > Hi Malcolm,
> > >
> > >
> > > >I haven't downloaded the file as I don't have a
> > > suitable program to
> > > >open it with available on the NW. I do have a tip
> > > to deal with the
> > > >problem mentioned in the previous paragraph: the
> > > way to increase the
> > > >isolation barrier without consuming a lot of board
> > > space is to
> > > >physically cut a slot in the board across the
> > > isolation barrier. This
> > > >gets rid of the problem of surface tracking. I
> > > presume fibreglass is
> > > >the material of choice for this board? <paxolin or
> > > anything like it
> > > >is OUT>.
> > > >
> > > >Malcolm
> > > ><snip>
> > >
> > >
> > > That is a very good idea! Tracking under these long
> > > resistors could be a
> > > big problem especially with a little left over flux.
> > >
> > > Jimmy - Could we drill 4 big holes under the
> > > resistors?
> > >
> > > Also, I think hooking to the board with very thin
> > > wire and then having
> > > spark gaps on the board to take "bad" events is the
> > > way to go. Maybe
> > > solder "BB's" or 1/4 inch balls to the board at some
> > > spacing. The spark
> > > gaps could take a big high voltage high current hit
> > > (arc at 2500V) and then
> > > the thin wires could blow apart and basically take
> > > things out of the
> > > circuit. I'll see if I can figure something simple
> > > out there...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Terry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >=====
> >Jimmy
> >