[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: JAVATC v10



Original poster: Bart Anderson <classi6-at-classictesla-dot-com> 

Hi Terry,

Thank you. I still have updates to make as time allows and more outputs to 
include (forward transfer impedance, etc.). Gerry has provided several good 
thoughts. It would be nice to see a program of this "type/ability" written 
in C or Java where the program could be compiled to increase speed and get 
away from browser/javascript limitations, but I'm not the right person for 
that. Someday someone will do it.

Thanks again and take care,
Bart
PS: Stangenes is working perfectly. Went though various measurements this 
weekend including planewave calibration etc.. (seems I use the planewave 
almost exclusively these days as well as the low-z amp). Excellent toys!!

Tesla list wrote:

>Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-twfpowerelectronics-dot-com>
>
>Hi Bart,
>
>I just wanted to say THANKS!! for working so hard on this wonderful program!!
>
>I incorporates all the latest theory and everything into one program!!
>
>By far, the most powerful and comprehensive Tesla coiling program out 
>there now!!
>
>Cheers,
>
>         Terry
>
>
>At 09:17 PM 9/19/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>Hi ALL -
>>
>>JAVATC version 10 has been in testing for a couple months now. I think 
>>it's finally ready for all List members to use it as they see fit. It is 
>>a complete re-write. I wanted to take advantage of Paul Nicholson's GEOTC 
>>(the core code which FANTC uses) and pull GEOTC's accuracy into JAVATC. 
>>This has been accomplished, but was not an easy task. I'd like to say  a 
>>special thank you to John Couture and Gerry Reynolds for their very 
>>detailed feedback over the past couple months. I'd also like to thank 
>>everyone else who tested the program.
>>
>>JAVATC will now account for walls, ceiling, groundplane, multiple topload 
>>objects, and inductive and capacitive variations due to non-linear 
>>current distribution. JAVATC can now run helical, cone, inv. cone, and 
>>flat geometry for
>
>
>..........
>
>
>
>