[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another 942 run
Original poster: "John Richardson" <jprich-at-up-dot-net>
Hi John,
I am running a Terry Blake propellar style gap, and with this design, i.e.
tungsten rod running thru a 1 by 1 by 3 piece of HDPE, it's hard to keep the
tolerances that one might expect with a lathe trued G-10 rotor gap. I plan
to redo the rotating assembly in the near future with UHMWP, but for now,
it's a "run whatcha brung" kind of a set up. Terry has seen the pictures of
my assembly, and I would post pics if I had a digital camera. With this
style gap, it's hard to maintain perfect concentricity and down to the mil
per side kind of tolerances. The safety gaps would fire when I was going to
extremes on the phase, but in the sweet spot, everything seemed OK. I was
just playing with the phase to get a feel for the system, as your control
system and RSGs are new to me.
John Richardson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Another 942 run
> Original poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com
>
> In a message dated 3/8/04 11:02:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
>
> >. I think that I will set the
> >RSG a little tighter than the NST gap, because if the RSG gap doesn't
fire,
> >the NST gap will, popping the 20 amp breaker!
>
>
> John,
>
> I'm not sure what you're saying. The RSG gap electrodes should
> run quite close at about 0.10" spacing or less usually. This spacing
> should be much closer than the safety gap spacing. A too-wide
> spacing can make the coil run unsteady. Of course they can't be
> set so tight that the electrodes strike each other and break. But you
> can try various spacings and see if it gets steadier at a closer
> spacings. Some coils can tolerate a somewhat wide RSG gap
> spacing, but many cannot. Wide spacings may also cause
> the safety gaps to fire. Safety gaps should never fire when
> using an SRSG when it's running correctly.
>
> John
>
>