[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: High Voltage Probe Instability
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: High Voltage Probe Instability
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:35:26 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:35:29 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <W3unFB.A.8lC.PGECCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "David Rieben" <drieben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dave, all,
Yep, the divider resistor heating was what I was starting to
think as the culprit myself. I would assume that the initial volt-
age measurement would be the most accurate one and not
the "heated" divider measurement? Thanks for the input.
David Rieben
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: High Voltage Probe Instability
Original poster: Sparktron01@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi David
My bet is you're seeing a +TCR effect (heating) of the divider resistors.
As an example, 1.0 Megohm 1W Yageo metal-oxide resistors at Digikey are
listed as 300ppm (0.03%) per deg C. If you have a 100 deg C rise on the
divider string (a lot I realize) will equal ~ 3% TCR. If the TCR stacking
is + on one side
of the divider and - on the other, a 5% delta would be relatively easy to
achieve.
On my HV monitoring system, the divider resistors are mounted on a PCB
immersed in oil as an insulating (and heat sink cooling) medium. Worse
case error term seen (even with 50kV thermal soak) was << 1% (at 80% rated
power dissapation).
Regards
Dave Sharpe, TCBOR/HEAS
Chesterfield, VA. USA