[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copper Banding?

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Copper Banding?
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:51:51 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
Resent-date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:52:09 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <LXFGOD.A.HqC.3w0ICB@poodle>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: BunnyKiller <bunikllr@xxxxxxx>

hmmmm... for some unknown reason to me I would have to say no ( just a gut feeling) the dia of the primary would be quite different plus you have a higher "density" of turns per equalvailent radius...

I suppose it would be like wrapping a secondary with 1000 feet of #30 wire compared to #20 wire.. the #20 secondary would be quite a bit taller thus a different L.

Scot D

Tesla list wrote:

Original poster: "david baehr" <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In a previouse post, it was stated that a banded pri. would have less inductance than a copper tubing pri. Could someone explain this ? IF YA got 50' of copper tubing , and 50' of banded pri. , wouldnt be about the same ????????////

Prev by Date: Resulting static after TC runs
Next by Date: RE: Resulting static after TC runs
Previous by thread: Re: Copper Banding?
Next by thread: Re: Copper Banding?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread