[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another 942C failure mode?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Another 942C failure mode?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:24:17 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:24:06 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <FrF7QD.A.qaC.F9crCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
Steve C,
Wow, that just confirmed what my simulations said! I was pushing
about 90A RMS when the caps failed.
I ran the coil again last night, but was plagued by secondary to
primary flashing due to the humidity (its not always a problem). Once
i finally got the insulation fixed, it was about time to wrap it up.
Only got maybe a 45 second solid run at full power. The MMC was still
cool after that. I kept it to 175uS which should be about 85A RMS
from my sim, which should be no problem for 6 strings of caps.
Steve Ward
On 6/12/05, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> At 10:16 12/06/05 -0600, you wrote:
> >i dont know the RMS current... I do know the peak current was about 800A
>
>
> You can roughly estimate the RMS current from the peak current:
>
> Irms ~= Ipeak*sqrt(burst length/period between bursts)*(1/sqrt(2))
>
> So if your peak current was 800A, your burst length was 250us, and your
> breakrate was 120Hz, the RMS current would be about 90A.
>
> This formula holds for spark gap coils too but the constant is nearer 1/2
> than (1/sqrt(2))
>
>
> Steve Conner
>
>
>
>