[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Streamer length vs. power delivery time...
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Streamer length vs. power delivery time...
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:20:47 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:20:40 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <edj1zC.A.g-F.vT4sCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
> The graph is showing commutative "streamer energy" not coil
> energy/bang. The second to the last page lists your total bang energy at
> 15.476 joules. At 120 BPS, that is 1857 watts.
(snip)
>
> I am using "streamer energy" not "bang energy" in the graph. Just a matter
> of which data column I picked up in the graph. No rhyme nor reason that I
> did not pick total energy I guess that is what the program just happened to
> be set for... But no problem, everything is ok. I got 15.476 joules...
>
(snip)
Ok, slightly confused now! Maybe if you look at the sim file i sent
you, you may find that i have made some silly error with my streamer
model. At the output of the resonator, i just have 6pF and 220k in
parallel to ground, is that the correct way to model it???
So then i integrate the power through the 220k resistor alone to get my 15J.
How would i figure out only the "Streamer" energy as ScanTesla is doing?
Steve
> Cheers,
>
> Terry