Re: ScanTesla-TRSSTC-730 - Tesla's CS coil

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Mike,

With Antonio's brand new TRSSTC engine, we can do Tesla's Colorado Springs 
coil now!!! ;-))

However, I don't have Richard Hull's analysis of that coil, and I have no 
idea what the numbers are.  If anyone would happen to know any of the 
following it would sure help?

* Cprimary =
* Rprimary =
* Lprimary =
* Lsecondary =
* Coupling =
* Rsecondary =
* Csecondary =
* Ltertiary =
* Rtertiary =
* Ctertiary =
* VCprimary Initial Value =
* BPS =
* Coil Power Limit (watts) =




This program simulates the structure:
    +v1-      k12         -i3+
 +---C1--R1--+   +--R2--+--L3--R3--+--R4--+
+|         + |   | +    |  +       |  +   |  +
vin       i1 L1 L2 i2   C2 v2      C3 v3  C4 v4
-|         - |   | -    |  -       |  -   |  -
 +-----------+   +------+----------+------+


Courier font ;-)



I can guess at things like the resistances.  But if anyone happens to have 
a nice list of any of this handy...

Cheers,

        Terry
        teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




> Hi Mike,
>
> Tesla should have made it a DRSSTC :o))))
>
> The program only does a conventional two coil system at the moment and 
> Tesla's coil was a three coil magnifier type system.  "I" am not sure even 
> what model to use there, but Antonio has worked much in the three coil area...
>
> If the Antonio Engine were modified for a three coil system, adding the 
> extra elements to the rest of the program would be very easy.  One may be 
> able to simply make the extra elements null values so the two coil case 
> could still run under the same program...  It would really be very easy to 
> implement once the base model is known...
>
> Of course, the real challenge first was just to get "any program" to 
> "work".  Now we seem to have gotten there and can think about where to go 
> next.  The streamer dynamic load model seems to get a lot of attention too...
>
> I think we should slow down a little and let folks catchup and play with 
> the program and see where they want it to go next.  I have spent all week 
> working on it and I know there are folks trying to catch up, so I wish to 
> give them a chance, and for me to "rest" (I never really rest  ;-))
>
> It is probably best not to go drastically changing the program at this 
> point unless a little bug pops up...  Keeping the program in one place 
> allows others to come up to speed without trying to hit a moving 
> target...  I want to spend time now "playing" with the program rather than 
> changing it :-))  Like Steve Conner, I also have to "fix" my DRSSTC to be 
> as good as Steve Ward's >:o)))   Scan Tesla shows us some pretty obvious 
> improvements that need to be made!!!
>
> I ponder the contour plots...  The DRSSTC seems to be so much better in 
> every way......  What do all the surfaces mean....
>
> BTW - The www.drsstc.com server and the www.hot-streamer.com server have 
> their bandwidth now ;-))  I can also answer question off-list if anyone 
> has any about the program.
>
> Cheers,
>
>         Terry
> teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> At 06:12 PM 6/21/2005, you wrote:
> > Hi Terry,
> >               Now that you have the cool program running to play "what 
> > if" on the coil data, I really do wonder how it thinks it would improve 
> > on Tesla's CS coil that was duplicated as close as could be (the 51 feet 
> > diameter one). As you have a lot of data on that coil, could you run 
> > this beast through the computer and see what it would have done 
> > different? (well, besides being a DRSSTC to begin with).
> > Mike
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: ScanTesla700 - Now were playing with power :-)
> >
> >
> > > Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>