[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:07:14 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:08:44 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9jAtaB.A.QKE.ipcwCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
Jared & Co.
In science, perhaps unfortunately, it is the new theory on the block
that must prove itself. This means:
1) Adequate specific procedures and hard data must be provided to allow
third parties to attempt duplication of any results that purport to support
the theory.
2) The new theory must reduce to the traditional one in all cases where the
traditional explanation is known to hold.
3) The new theory must also, in at least one repeatable case, make an
accurate prediction where the traditional theory does not.
Again, the more revolutionary the theory, the more extensive and
compelling the evidence must be. I do not think that the majority of
professional scientists on the list feel that your postings have risen to
this level yet.
Matt D.
.In a message dated 6/28/05 2:17:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
You cited mathematical errors, but were not specific. You claim that
we prey on newbies and in the same breath you advocate velocity
factors that we have already demonstrated are untrue (proof by
contradiction) with our Capacitance to Free Space experiment.
I think that you have been lulled into believing that simple equations
could not possibly describe something as complicated as a resonant
coil. Yet simple equations; energy equations in particular, are the
cornerstones of physics.
Jared Dwarshuis