[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No Terry filter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: No Terry filter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 11:00:43 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:01:53 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <JT3OeB.A.96D.9zldCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "david baehr" <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
A couple weeks ago I tried substituting my static gap with a SRSG with not
so good results, safety gap fired as much as the main gap , and, took out a
cap. This was after much adjusting,...my coil just didnt like it,....any
ideas ??( My coil is powered by a single bushing 1.5kva pig with a
homemaded gapped inductive ballast)
>>I've had good results over the years too without any safety
>>filters.
>>My old research coil with the 12/30 NST, then later the TT-42
>>coil never ruined any transformers provided I used a SRSG.
>>Even the use of resonant sized cap values did not destroy
>>the NST's provided that an SRSG was used.
>>The static gaps were prone to destroying the NST's despite
>>shorter output spark lengths. I do use safety gaps however.
>>In SRSG use, they never fire however. They're there in case
>>something else fails.
>>
>>John
>>
>
>
>
>