[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MOV lightning arrestor in place of safety gap...MCOV?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: MOV lightning arrestor in place of safety gap...MCOV?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 18:05:16 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:13:39 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <CUsmh.A.G_E.nIsdCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "J. Aaron Holmes" <jaholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The datasheets talk about tests involving hundreds of
amps for several seconds. I'm hoping a NST would be
harmless to one of these.
--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: Terry Fritz
> <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
>
> Mild current limited voltage testing will not hurt
> them as say from a small
> HV power supply (10mA). They mean the full current
> over voltage test done
> at the transformer repair shop which is NOT current
> limited other than a
> breaker. That would quickly overheat and destroy
> the MOV stack.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
>
> At 08:38 AM 5/2/2005, you wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I have one installed internally on my 10KVA pig,
> and there was a sticker
> >saying not to test it.
> >
> >Just checked.
> >
> >CAUTION
> >MOV arrestor installed. Do not overvoltage test.
> >
> >So it seems that testing might trash them for
> lightning protection purposes.
> >
> >David E Weiss
>
>
>