[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:51:18 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:56:55 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <1RRj-D.A.1xE.erhLDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones" <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Ed,
I for one: Just because I did not comment does not mean that I did not read
your posts with interest.
Robert (R. A.) Jones
A1 Accounting, Inc., Fl
407 649 6400
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
> Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Familiar quote. Note the stress on transmission by CONDUCTION! No
> miracles, no hidden technique. Problem with conduction is all in the
> numbers and they say no way at all. I've posted my analysis several
> times and no one has seemed interested in looking at the calculations
> and commenting on them. I sure wish Tesla were around today to discuss
> some of the problems and explain why no one (including himself) has ever
> made the system work. If you read this quote carefully you will sure
> get the impression that he intended Wardenclyffe only as a
> communications (won't say radio because he hated radiation) transmitter,
> as is often reported. No claim of transmitting power.
>
> This stuff in Anderson is most interesting indeed and I wonder how many
> people have studied it, including the part about using a vertical
> antenna with resonant loading coil in his very early communication
> experiments. The pictures of his equipment and the narrative are pretty
> convincing, but he never published any of this work so we'll have to
> take his word for the early date.
>
> Ed
>
>