[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tungsten Blanks

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tungsten Blanks
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:09:26 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:03:22 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <Ajf8J5_kRjK.A.uYE.6oZwDB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: fiftyguy@xxxxxxx

 Original poster: Thomas Coyle <<mailto:zxcasd%40gmail.com>zxcasd@xxxxxxxxx>

The actual McMaster numbers are:

Tungsten Carbide, 1.024" diameter:
6": 191.37
12": 365.71

High-density tungsten alloy rod, 1" diameter:
8": 236.47
12": 325.31

Yeah, but the McMaster stuff is alloy, 90% Tungsten, remaindernickle and copper.

Wouldn't these other metals have a deletrious effect on quenching?
Has anybody done testing to determine the importance of the Tungsten purity?

Any definitve answers on whether thoriated, etc. TIG rods workbetter/worse than the pure ones?


-Phil LaBudde

Prev by Date: Re: Newbie cap and topload questions
Next by Date: Re: HV xray cable revisited
Previous by thread: Re: Tungsten Blanks
Next by thread: Re: Tungsten Blanks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread