RE: [] Re: 80' - 300' Lightning

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Anthony R. Mollner" <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, and Tesla's Colorado Springs coil was 50 something feet in Diameter,
well the primary anyways. I wonder why no one else has remade that lab? Mr.
Bill Wysock has made that monster one of his but it's still not as big as
Colorado Springs was. I think all of us should get together and build a
reproduction of Tesla's lab!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 3:49 PM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PHISH] Re: 80' - 300' Lightning


Original poster: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>

Yeah, and it can make a DOD EMP detector satellite
think a 10 - 15 ton nuke just went off! Cool!

Adam

--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 > Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson"
 > <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >
 > Hi Shelton,
 >
 > I use CSI pulse caps myself. Excellent cap
 > manufacturer, but still,
 > no matter how big the cap is, the remarks about the
 > spark lengths are
 > absolutely bogus. The coil just can't do that. The
 > coil size couldn't
 > handle the power even if you threw the needed power
 > at it. The coil
 > would need to be scaled by at least by 1 magnitude.
 > The gap, top
 > load, primary, power supply, etc.. are all not even
 > in the same
 > universe as what would be required to do those spark
 > lengths. It's
 > probably the dumbest thing I've ever read, but it is
 > a very nice
 > looking coil. Other than the ignorant spark length
 > statements, it's
 > certainly a nice coil.
 >
 > Take care,
 > Bart
 >


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com