Re: Mysterious Streamers (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:30:55 -0500
From: BunnyKiller <bunnikillr@xxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Mysterious Streamers (fwd)

This is what I love about this list...

people take the time to think and extrapolate the info involved and make 
a decision on examining the evidence supplied...

this is where the true answers come from....

Scot D



Tesla list wrote:

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:32:03 -0400
>From: Dave Pierson <davep@xxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Mysterious Streamers (fwd)
>
> 
>  
>
>>>It is likely the camera took its photo normally, but after 
>>>the shutter closed the CCD was still recording. 
>>>      
>>>
>>After thinking about this some more, I think we can learn
>>something useful from this.  If anybody on this list is so
>>inclined, they could find a lens material that filters more than
>>just visible light, but also wider range of frequencies.  It
>>would be patentable and saleable to camera manufacturers.
>>    
>>
>    Or, perhaps, understand the ways cameras can be 'fooled'.
>
>  
>
>>Apparently, the resonance phenomenon behind the street lamp
>>portion of the image, and the resonance phenomenon behind the
>>striations in the haze are similar processes but with different
>>materials and different resulting frequencies.  The orange haze
>>must be a radio light source caused by the resonance of the gases
>>near the top load,
>>    
>>
>    Must?
>    Might be many things, including, but not limited to
>     diffuse refelction of street lamps.
>     oddly rendered corona
>
>  
>
>>and the camera CCD happens to be sensitive
>>enough to pick it up.  I'll bet nobody watching the Tesla coil
>>saw any kind of haze over the top load with their eyes.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Engineering coils to produce different photographic light effects
>>could open a new extension for Tesla coiling with both practical
>>and artistic results.  Didn't Tesla develop a method for
>>producing light in the middle of a room and even over a city?
>>    
>>
>     With lamps, yes.
>     I do not recal 'free floating light' being claimed.
>     The Colorado SPrings Notes have some interesting thoughts
>     on phtotgraphy by spark discharge.  (Read, however, carefully:
>     some of the pix are plainly described as DOUBLE EXPOSURES.)
>
>     best
>      dwp
>
>
>
>
>  
>