RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:21:57 -0500
From: Rich & DJ <rdj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Tesla list' <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)

I am asking for a little help in understanding. I am not an electrician or
EE. I guess I spoke out of turn about 208v. A transformer I have on a coil
is 13Kv at 1.9Kva with a 208Vac input, it is from a laser. I remember when I
was working some of the computer rooms were had 208v. I thought it was used
more often.
Rich from the middle of Missouri.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:32 PM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)

In my industry, most everything is 480. We consider
208 a bastard, that is pretty much useless for large
motors. Over 500 - 600 hp, we use 4,160.

Adam

--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:06 -0500
> From: Rich & DJ <rdj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 'Tesla list' <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)
> 
> Are you sure it is not 208V input, that is a
> standard voltage for industrial
> transformers. My PT transformer is 208 input.
> Rich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 12:16 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 09:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
> From: J. Aaron Holmes <jaholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)
> 
> Yeah, hard to read.  I think the VA is 1750.  At
> least, I can't think of what else that number would
> represent...
> 
> Aaron, N7OE
> 
> --- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 09:03:52 -0700
> > From: Jim Mora <jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: 'Tesla list' <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: usable potential transformers? (fwd)
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > Yes, I was looking at (1) of these, though $'s are
> > tight now. I have put in
> > a request to the seller find out the VA rating
> since
> > the plate is
> > unreadable. I am assuming (always dangerous) that
> > the Pot xformer is
> > removable from the apparent stand. It would be
> nice
> > to go up to this voltage
> > but quenching even on a 17" rotor, may become an
> > issue??
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > Long arcs,
> > Jim Mora
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 7:01 AM
> > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: usable potential transformers? (fwd)
> > 
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 08:41:00 -0400
> > From: Dave Goodfellow <dgoodfelo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: usable potential transformers?
> > 
> > On ebay now Item number: 220125509946
> > Looks like 25000 to 120, but it is hard to see the
> > plate.
> > 
> > Dave Goodfellow
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________
________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news