RE: primary position (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:45:47 -0400
From: Scott Bogard <teslas-intern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: primary position (fwd)

Marko,
     I believe that the magnetic field on the bottom is 180 degrees "out of 
phase" with the magnetic field on top, so placing the primary in the middle 
would cause the lower windings to fight the top windings, its one of the 
many "right hand" rules that causes this (unless the bottom part of the 
secondary was wound in the opposite direction, and center tapped grounded).  
Correct me if I'm mistaken guys.
Scott Bogard.


>From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: primary position (fwd)
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:10:01 -0600 (MDT)
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:41:47 -0400
>From: Marko Ruban <Marko@xxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: primary position
>
>All of the cylindrical secondary designs I've seen (which is not many),
>place the primary coil at the bottom of secondary.  Would placing the
>primary at the center of secondary improve TC efficiency, by letting the
>secondary take advantage of the lower part of magnetic field produced by
>primary?
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. 
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01