[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: double wound secondary (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: double wound secondary (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:54:00 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:54:01 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <YjT0Ygq4yXG.A.xZE.JAlBHB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:50:36 -0700
From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: double wound secondary (fwd)

That makes perfect sense, because the coil-over-coil will have twice the
number of turns as the bifilar coil will have.  Been there, done that,
measured it."

	True IF and ONLY IF you connect the coils in SERIES AIDING with accompanying capacitance and voltage breakdown problems.

Ed

Prev by Date: Re: Current Distribution Re: Aluminium aka Aluminum Wire (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: More Wireless Power Transmission (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: double wound secondary (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: double wound secondary (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread