Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:47:44 EDT
From: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)

 
In a message dated 9/1/07 3:37:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

Besides,  for a SRSG at 240 bps with a .05uF cap, well, 
that is just a nice  configuration. And further to that, as D.C. had 
suggested around 0.04uF,  that is doable as well. It's still LTR, just a 
little less. So 240 bps at  .02uF (see how the cost comes down?).

Take  care,
Bart



Hi Bart,
 
    It seems to me that a SRSG at 240 BPS on a 60 HZ  line would have near 
zero volts at every other presentation. How is this  efficient?
 
Matt D.



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour