[TCML] Wireless Transmission Theory

[resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

There were several errors in Corum's papers.  Just keep this in mind if
you are using their ideas for serious research work.

I wish Gary and Rich Quick all the best luck though in their attempts to
make new discoveries.

Dr. Resonance




> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Gary Peterson wrote:
>
>> Regarding the wireless transmission of electrical energy between a Tesla
>> coil transmitter and a Tesla coil receiver, it is my understanding that
>> only
>> three mechanisms are available according to accepted electromagnetic
>> field
>> theory.  These are far-field electromagnetic radiation or ordinary radio
>> waves, mutual induction and mutual capacitance.
>
> There is a fourth:  travelling EM waves coupled to a conductor.  Waves of
> current in a conductor and voltage along a conductor are coupled to EM
> travelling waves.  After all, that's how a TC secondary works, as
> described in Corum's papers.
>
> Imagine winding a TC secondary onto a rubber hose: a very long, very
> narrow coil with a rubber core.  If you inductively inject EM pulses near
> one end of this coiled wire, they will travel along it.  That's not
> "radiation," any more than DC circuits involve radiation.  It's nearfield
> physics.
>
> The Goubau or "G-line" uses similar physics, but without the coil.  The 2D
> case is the Zenneck surface waves travelling over a resistive
> plane.  And as with G-lines, the challenge is to build a "launcher" which
> matches transmitter impedance to the waveguide.  For VLF, the launcher
> size would necessarily be << wavelength, so a high-Q resonant matching
> network would be an obvious choice.
>
> Note well that these are not "radio waves..."  or perhaps I should turn it
> around and say that 60Hz power lines and flashlight circuits are actually
> conductive waveguides for EM fields, for electromagnetic energy of low
> frequency.
>
>
>
>> Another proposed mechanism for which a mathematical description is
>> presently
>> being sought is that which Tesla referred to as "electrostatic
>> induction."
>> Can you help me out in this regard?
>
> That sounds like another way of saying "mutual capacitance."
>
> (((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty                http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
> beaty chem washington edu       Research Engineer
> billbamascicom                  UW Chem Dept,  Bagley Hall RM74
> 206-543-6195                    Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>


Dr. Resonance

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla