RE: [TCML] Primary angles

[david baehr <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

how about conical secondaries,..any advantage ?
 
 
 
> > In a message dated 11/28/2008 2:35:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, > Gary.Lau@xxxxxx writes:> > I'm not sure there's any reason to use any primary geometry other than a > flat one, regardless of secondary size or power. It may seem that there's some > efficiency to using a conical primary - that it somehow "focuses" or directs > the primary energy towards the secondary more effectively than a flat primary > does. But it doesn't.> Regards, Gary Lau> MA, USA> > **************Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW > AOL.com. > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)> _______________________________________________> Tesla mailing list> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_________________________________________________________________
Proud to be a PC? Show the world. Download the “I’m a PC” Messenger themepack now.
hthttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119642558/direct/01/_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla