RE: [TCML]new law

["Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>]

Technically, I believe these would be considered to be corollaries of Murphy's Law.

Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of STEVEN COOK
> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 10:05 AM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML]new law
> 
> 
> 
> Is this a new law?
> 
> The likelyhood of damage to a component is inversely proportional to the number
> you have available, and directly proportional to its cost.
> 
> I only raise this 'cos once again I've just destroyed a chip that cost more than the
> rest of the circuit put together. How come I never blow a cheap resistor?
> 
> Another law might be that: The likelyhood of destroying an electronic component is
> proportional to the number of joints you need to unsolder.

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla